How does hadron collider work
That's because there's never been a particle accelerator as powerful as the LHC. The best any scientist can do is provide an educated guess. Several of the scientists also claim they'd be happy if the evidence the LHC generates contradicts their expectations, as that would mean there'd be even more to learn. The Large Hadron Collider is a massive and powerful machine.
It consists of eight sectors. Each sector is an arc bounded on each end by a section called an insertion. The LHC's circumference measures 27 kilometers The accelerator tubes and collision chambers are meters feet underground. Scientists and engineers can access the service tunnel the machinery sits in by descending in elevators and stairways located at several points along the circumference of the LHC.
The LHC uses magnets to steer beams of protons as they travel at The magnets are very large, many weighing several tons. There are about 9, magnets in the LHC. The magnets are cooled to a chilly 1. That's colder than the vacuum of outer space. Even a single molecule of gas could cause an experiment to fail. There are six areas along the circumference of the LHC where engineers will be able to perform experiments.
Think of each area as if it were a microscope with a digital camera. The LHC and the experiments connected to it contain about million sensors. Those sensors will collect data and send it to various computing systems. On a yearly basis, this means the LHC will gather about 15 petabytes of data.
A petabyte is a million gigabytes. It takes a lot of energy to run the LHC. CERN estimates that the annual power consumption for the collider will be about , megawatt hours MWh. It could have been much higher, but the facility will not operate during the winter months. Why cool the magnets down to just above the temperature of absolute zero?
At that temperature, the electromagnets can operate without any electrical resistance. The LHC uses 10, tons 9, metric tons of liquid nitrogen to cool the magnets down to 80 degrees Kelvin Then it uses about 60 tons 54 metric tons of liquid helium to cool them the rest of the way [source: CERN].
The principle behind the LHC is pretty simple. First, you fire two beams of particles along two pathways, one going clockwise and the other going counterclockwise. You accelerate both beams to near the speed of light. Then, you direct both beams toward each other and watch what happens. The equipment necessary to achieve that goal is far more complex. Before any protons or ions enter the LHC, they've already gone through a series of steps. First, scientists must strip electrons from hydrogen atoms to produce protons.
These machines use devices called radio frequency cavities to accelerate the protons. The cavities contain a radio -frequency electric field that pushes the proton beams to higher speeds. Giant magnets produce the magnetic fields necessary to keep the proton beams on track. In car terms, think of the radio frequency cavities as an accelerator and the magnets as a steering wheel.
The beams continue to pick up speed. By now, beams have divided into bunches. Each bunch contains 1. Inside the LHC, the beams continue to accelerate. This takes about 20 minutes. At top speed, the beams make 11, trips around the LHC every second. The two beams converge at one of the six detector sites positioned along the LHC. At that position, there will be million collisions per second [source: CERN ].
When two protons collide, they break apart into even smaller particles. That includes subatomic particles called quarks and a mitigating force called gluon. Quarks are very unstable and will decay in a fraction of a second. The detectors collect information by tracking the path of subatomic particles.
Then the detectors send data to a grid of computer systems. Not every proton will collide with another proton. Even with a machine as advanced as the LHC, it's impossible to direct beams of particles as small as protons so that every particle will collide with another one. Protons that fail to collide will continue in the beam to a beam dumping section. There, a section made of graphite will absorb the beam.
The beam dumping sections are able to absorb beams if something goes wrong inside the LHC. To learn more about the mechanics behind particle accelerators, take a look at How Atom Smashers Work. What do these detectors do and how do they work?
The events inside the LHC will also produce photons the particles of light , positrons anti-particles to electrons and muons negatively charged particles that are heavier than electrons.
The six areas along the circumference of the LHC that will gather data and conduct experiments are simply known as detectors. Some of them will search for the same kind of information, though not in the same way. There are four major detector sites and two smaller ones. It measures 46 meters At its core is a device called the inner tracker. Surrounding the inner tracker is a calorimeter. Calorimeters measure the energy of particles by absorbing them.
Many high energy particles, from collisions, are produced every second, but the detectors are designed to track and stop all particles except neutrinos as capturing all the energy from collisions is essential to identifying what particles have been produced. The vast majority of energy from the collisions is absorbed by the detectors, meaning, very little of the energy from collisions is able to escape. Collisions with energies far higher than the ones in the experiment are quite common in the universe!
Even solar radiation bombarding our atmosphere can produce the same results; the experiments do this in a more controlled manner for scientific study. The main danger from these energy levels is to the LHC machine itself. The beam of particles has the energy of a Eurostar train travelling at full speed and should something happen to destabilise the particle beam there is a real danger that all of that energy will be deflected into the wall of the beam pipe and the magnets of the LHC, causing a great deal of damage.
This all happens in milliseconds, meaning that the particles would have navigated just less than 3 circuits before the dump is complete. Careers Media Office. Which universities contribute to CERN? Why was the LHC built underground? Can the LHC make a new universe? Is CERN studying nuclear power or nuclear weapons?
The particles we discover in colliders like these exist only under extremely rare conditions, require extraordinary effort to produce, and are incredibly unstable, existing for only fractions of a second. This highlights an interesting fact about physics: our approximations of the physical world work astoundingly well, allowing us to figure out most industrial applications of physical principles even when our grasp of them is very bare bones.
That said, the case for the Future Circular Collider is that it might teach us new things about the universe, not that it can lead to new techniques because it happens to be a hugely ambitious construction project. Theoretical physicists are largely in agreement on all of that. What divides them is, in significant part, disagreement over where the money could go instead. It might make more sense to fund a hundred of those experiments than build one collider for 10 times as much money.
There are also medium and small-scale experiments that tend to fall off the table if big collaborations eat up the bulk of money and attention. Carroll disagrees. He pointed me to the debate in the s about building a particle accelerator in Texas, one large enough to have discovered the Higgs Boson and perhaps even more.
Some physicists observed at the time that the money might go farther if it were dedicated to other physics experiments, and the collider was voted down. But did the money then go to other physics experiments? Hossenfelder is among those more strongly opposed to the collider, but the striking thing about her series of blog posts opposing it is that she is primarily concerned by what she sees as a dishonest attempt to make the case for the collider sound stronger than it is.
But these are mysteries that the accelerator is unlikely to resolve. Hossenfelder writes:. It is correct that the standard model requires extension, but there is no reason that the new physical effects, like particles making up dark matter, must be accessible at the next larger collider.
I get the sense we need someone like Wilson, who openly told Congress that the accelerator he and other researchers dreamed of would have no defense applications, no security applications, no benefits against the Russians. Now read: What is the Higgs Boson, and why is it so important?
Check out our ExtremeTech Explains series for more in-depth coverage. This site may earn affiliate commissions from the links on this page. Terms of use. This newsletter may contain advertising, deals, or affiliate links.
Subscribing to a newsletter indicates your consent to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. You may unsubscribe from the newsletter at any time.
0コメント